We regret that an issue for which there are such clear, reasonable and effective solutions which promote smart networks and new service choices while still preventing anti-competitive behavior has gone down such a controversial and contentious path.
There is broad, bipartisan opposition to reclassification in Congress, and increasing realization within the creative and technology communities that creative rights and the creative economy depend on the certainty of tech investments, which result in the development of new businesses and intelligent networks that are threatened by this Title ll reclassification.
We believe the future of creative rights is not well served by regulations that limit how creators can collaborate, innovate and protect their creative rights. Instead, we hope the Commission will recognize that their goal should be to check harmful behavior, not to regulate creative and technological innovation in ways that will ultimately disrupt the vibrant Internet ecosystem and limit consumer choice.
Leave a comment